Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: Available data are conflicting and limited regarding the antimicrobial effectiveness of 0.05% chlorhexidine gluconate (0.05% CHG) with hydrophilic inflatable penile prostheses (IPP). We used a large multi-institutional cohort to explore the relationship between intraoperative 0.05% CHG use and hydrophilic IPP infection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multi-institutional review of patients who underwent hydrophilic IPP implantation. Consecutive cases involving intraoperative 0.05% CHG as an irrigant and/or dip were compared with a similar number of consecutive control cases without 0.05% CHG. The primary outcome was IPP explant for infection. Predictors of infection were assessed with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Exploratory subgroup analyses further characterized specific 0.05% CHG scenarios. On subgroup analysis, the incidence of infection with use of 0.05% CHG as irrigant and dip was 4.5% compared with 3.8% when 0.05% CHG irrigation was used with antimicrobial dip. The rate of infection with 0.05% CHG use was 3.5% for primary surgeries and 12% for revision surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 0.05% CHG with hydrophilic IPP was associated with an elevated infection rate. For hydrophilic IPP surgery, caution with 0.05% CHG use is warranted pending additional prospective evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: