Why the study?
The SCAI Scientific Oversight Committee annually reviews the scientific needs of its membership, including survey-based research of practice patterns and perspectives, necessitating a standardized framework for conducting surveys.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Population
SCAI members and stakeholders in interventional cardiology
Design
Manual of standard operating procedures for performing scientific surveys
Provides reference for SCAI survey research; leaves open prospective validation of identified practice patterns.
The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) endeavors to serve the interventional cardiology community, including both clinicians and patients. The SCAI Scientific Oversight Committee is charged with annually reviewing the scientific needs of the membership at large, including survey-based research of the practice patterns and perspectives of SCAI members and stakeholders. This document is intended as a reference by the survey proponents, document writing groups, external collaborators, SCAI representatives, peer reviewers, and anyone seeking information about the SCAI surveys program. The aims of this SCAI document are to: (1) provide a framework for members to develop survey requests that are relevant, feasible, and align with the Society's missions and goals; (2) promote transparency and clarity for the process of performing a survey through SCAI; (3) establish the criteria for evaluating survey requests and provide input on reliable and meaningful design, data collection, and best practices; and (4) facilitate collaboration and communication between the survey committee and members of SCAI to maximize the impact of the findings to the interventional community at large.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Damluji et al. (2024) studied this question. The SCAI Manual of Standard Operating Procedures provides a framework and establishes criteria for developing, evaluating, and performing survey-based research within the interventional community.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: