Key result
SCAI 2020 think tank proceedings outline future action items across major interventional and structural subspecialties.
Why the study?
These proceedings aim to share discussions from the 2020 SCAI think tank with the wider cardiovascular community to enhance participation, generate dialogue, and aid in developing action items.
Presents the proceedings of the SCAI 2020 think tank to foster dialogue and develop action items across coronary, endovascular, structural, and congenital interventions.
Outlines expert priorities for interventional cardiology without altering practice; leaves open rigorous testing of proposed action items.
The society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions (SCAI) think tank is a collaborative venture that brings together interventional cardiologists, administrative partners, and select members of the cardiovascular industry community for high-level field-wide discussions. The 2020 think tank was organized into four parallel sessions reflective of the field of interventional cardiology: (a) coronary intervention, (b) endovascular medicine, (c) structural heart disease, and (d) congenital heart disease (CHD). Each session was moderated by a senior content expert and co-moderated by a member of SCAI's emerging leader mentorship program. This document presents the proceedings to the wider cardiovascular community in order to enhance participation in this discussion, create additional dialogue from a broader base, and thereby aid SCAI and the industry community in developing specific action items to move these areas forward.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naidu et al. (2020) studied Interventional cardiology. The SCAI 2020 think tank proceedings summarize discussions on coronary intervention, endovascular medicine, structural heart disease, and congenital heart disease to guide future action items.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: