Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Recent trends in centralization of pancreatic surgery happened as a response to improved outcomes in tertiary care institutions. The volume-outcome relationship is true for high volume hospitals and surgeons. Obstacles to patient travelling to high volume institutions and widespread quality care in community hospitals led to establishing a quality specialized pancreatic surgery program in the community. Methods: Two pancreatic surgery specialists relocated their program from a tertiary care center to a community hospital. Results of the first sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy procedures were studied. Results: One hundred and seventeen pancreatic surgery cases were analyzed, sixty-two pancreaticoduodenectomy and total pancreatectomy cases were included. Patient demographics were not different in regard to the median age (67 vs. 62 years), gender (65 vs. 62% males), median BMI (26.2 vs. 26 kg/m2), or American Society of Anesthesiologists class, in between the two hospitals. There was a significant decrease in the operative time (350 vs. 281 minutes, p=0.0001), estimated blood loss (409 vs. 156 milliliters, p=0.003), and length of hospital stay (7.2 vs. 5.2 days, p=0.0001). Most patients were operated on for a diagnosis of malignancy (74.2%), and the R0 resection rate was better at the community hospital reaching 95.2%. Transfusions, delayed gastric emptying and leaks tended to be better at the community hospital but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: With dedicated institutional support and careful program design, complex procedures such as PD can be successfully relocated to the community where superior results can be achieved.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Younan et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: