Key result
Concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor and CCB use is linked to ~53% higher odds of ADRs.
Why the study?
The risk of adverse drug reactions from concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors and calcium channel blockers in hypertensive patients was unclear.
Does concomitant treatment with a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a CCB increase the risk of adverse drug reactions in hypertensive patients?
Case-Control (n=17,430)
Does concomitant treatment with a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a CCB increase the risk of adverse drug reactions in hypertensive patients?
Odds Ratio: 1.53 (95% CI 0.95–2.47)
Concomitant use of a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a CCB in hypertensive patients is associated with a 53% increased odds of adverse drug reactions compared to CCB monotherapy, highlighting the need for caution with this combination.
Concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitors with CCBs may raise ADR risk; supports hypothesis generation but should not yet change practice.
PURPOSE: Grapefruit juice has been found to interact with calcium channel blockers (CCB). This interaction is due to certain nutrients found in grapefruit juice that block the activity of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 3A4 in the small intestine and liver. Inhibition of CYP3A4 markedly increases bioavailability and increases the risk of an adverse drug reaction (ADR). Many drugs are known to have CYP3A4-blocking activity. This study was performed to investigate whether the concomitant use of a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a CCB in hypertensive patients results in an elevated incidence of ADRs. METHODS: The study included data on 17,430 patients receiving a CCB. Data were obtained from an anti-hypertensive drug database developed by the RAD-AR Council, Japan. A nested case-control design was employed for this study. Cases are defined as patients experiencing an ADR during the follow-up period of 12 weeks. Four controls per case, matched for CCB use, were selected via incidence density sampling. An estimate of the association between the CYP3A4 inhibitor and the ADR was obtained via multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that the odds ratio for experiencing an ADR for the group treated concomitantly with a CCB and a CYP3A4 inhibitor was 1.35 (95% confidence intervals (95%CI), 1.02-1.78), compared with CCB monotherapy. The odds ratio based on multivariate analysis using the 1:4 matched dataset was 1.53 (95%CI, 0.95-2.47) after adjusting for possible confounding factors. CONCLUSIONS: The concomitant treatment with a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a CCB increases the risk of an ADR by 53%, compared with CCB monotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoshida et al. (2007) conducted a case-control in Hypertension (n=17,430). Concomitant treatment with a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker vs. Calcium channel blocker monotherapy was evaluated on Adverse drug reaction (ADR) (OR 1.53, 95% CI 0.95-2.47). Concomitant use of a CYP3A4 inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker increased the odds of an adverse drug reaction by 53% compared with CCB monotherapy (OR 1.53; 95% CI 0.95-2.47).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: