Key result
High normal blood pressure was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing manifest hypertension over 10 years compared to optimal blood pressure (OR 17.1).
Why the study?
The determinants of incident hypertension and the impact of baseline blood pressure categories in a representative Swedish population were not fully explored.
Do baseline blood pressure categories predict the 10-year incidence of hypertension in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=1,099)
No
Do baseline blood pressure categories predict the 10-year incidence of hypertension in adults without baseline cardiovascular disease?
Normal and high-normal baseline blood pressures strongly predict the development of manifest hypertension over 10 years, highlighting the importance of early identification and lifestyle interventions.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Baseline BP categories strongly predict incident hypertension risk; supports stratification in observational data but leaves open whether monitoring changes outcomes.
BACKGROUND: To explore the determinants of incident hypertension, and especially the impact of baseline blood pressure categories, in a representative Swedish population. METHODS: A 10-year longitudinal study of residents aged 30-74. Blood pressures were measured and categorized according to ESH guidelines with optimal blood pressure < 120/80 mmHg, normal 120-129/80-84 mmHg, and high normal 130-139/85-89 mmHg. Incident hypertension was defined as ongoing treatment or three consecutive blood pressure readings ≥ 140/ ≥ 90 mmHg (one or both) at follow-up, while those with ≥ 140 and/or ≥ 90 mmHg at only one or two visits were labelled as unstable. After excluding subjects with hypertension, ongoing blood pressure lowering medication or a previous CVD event at baseline, 1099 remained for further analyses. RESULTS: Sixteen (2.6%) subjects with optimal baseline blood pressure had hypertension at follow up. Corresponding numbers for subjects with normal, high normal and unstable blood pressure were 55 (19.4%), 50 (39.1%) and 46 (74.2%), respectively. Compared with subjects in optimal group those in normal, high normal and unstable blood pressure categories had significantly higher risk to develop manifest hypertension with odds ratios OR and (95% CI) of 7.04 (3.89-12.7), 17.1 (8.88-33.0) and 84.2 (37.4-190), respectively, with adjustment for age, BMI and family history for hypertension. The progression to hypertension was also independently predicted by BMI (p < 0.001), however, not by age. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with high normal or unstable blood pressure should be identified in clinical practice, evaluated for global hypertension risk and offered personalized advice on lifestyle modification for early prevention of manifest hypertension and cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lindblad et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Incident hypertension (n=1,099). High normal blood pressure vs. Optimal blood pressure was evaluated on Incident hypertension (OR 17.1, 95% CI 8.88-33.0, p=<0.001). High normal blood pressure was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing manifest hypertension over 10 years compared to optimal blood pressure (OR 17.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: