Introduction Large treatment wetlands (TWs) can provide decentralized wastewater treatment at infrastructure scale, but successful implementation requires the integration of site conditions, wastewater characteristics, treatment-train design, operation, financing, and governance across the project lifecycle. Methods We developed an integrated decision-support framework based on a structured qualitative evidence synthesis and a comparative assessment of 64 large-scale TW projects. Project-level data were extracted on location, wastewater source, inflow, population equivalent, wetland area and type, treatment train, vegetation, pretreatment, post-treatment, conventional pollutant removal, data limitations, and special design or operational features. Projects were grouped into 18 configuration categories. Evidence on emerging contaminants was synthesized separately at the compound-group level. Results Staged vertical-flow/horizontal-flow systems and pretreated vertical-flow systems showed strong removal performance for BOD 5 , COD, TSS/SS, nitrogen indicators, and total phosphorus when supported by adequate pretreatment, hydraulic distribution, monitoring, and operation and maintenance. Performance varied with influent strength, treatment objective, system configuration, pollutant-specific data availability, and evidence quality. Micropollutant attenuation was promising but compound-specific and depended on media selection, redox zoning, hydraulic retention time, vegetation, sorption capacity, and multi-barrier design. The resulting matrix links six framework dimensions to key decisions, indicators, red flags, planning outputs, readiness levels, and no-go risks. Discussion Large TWs should be planned as governable, adaptive, and multifunctional public infrastructure. The framework provides implementation-oriented support for early project screening, treatment-train selection, governance design, and long-term decentralized water management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossbach et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: