Key result
Lean and Six Sigma workflow analysis identifies CT scan approval times averaging ~920 minutes.
Why the study?
Non-value activities in radiology departments may lead to improper functioning and delays in scan reporting, affecting patient satisfaction and revenue generation.
Observational (n=120)
No
Application of Lean and Six Sigma tools in a radiology department identified report approval and preparation as the highest risk steps causing delays in scan reporting times.
Report approval carries highest delay risk in radiology; leaves open whether Lean/Six Sigma interventions shorten CT/MRI reporting times.
Hospitals are always looking for ways to improve their processes and systems to provide benefits for all the stakeholders.Radiology department is one of the revenue-generating areas in the hospital where short waiting times and positive experience represent important drivers of patient satisfaction.Quality of care has been given a major focus by hospital and health care organizations across the country.Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the two important modalities contributing to the revenues through radiology.Since the scan time being low, the significance for more revenue by increasing the patient load will add more value to the services.Certain non-value activities may lead to improper functioning of the department.Lean and Six Sigma tools have been used in this study to identify such activities.This led to reversal of negative performance indicators, streamlining the processes, and regaining the patient satisfaction in this hospital.Objectives: Streamline mapping of workflow to implement Lean and Six Sigma and to improvise the present performance of Radiology Department. Materials and methods:Prospective study with direct observation of workflow.A total of 120 patients were observed for a period of 1 month, to identify the time taken.Failure mode effect analysis (FMEA) was used to identify potential steps for failure, and their effects.Results: Number 490 is the maximum risk priority number (RPN) for report approval and preparation; 920 minutes was the average time taken for CT scan approval and 834 minutes was the time for MRI scan approval. Conclusion:The radiologists were pointing that lesser number of monitors were available for report preparation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sweety et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Radiology workflow (n=120). Lean and Six Sigma tools was evaluated on Time taken for scan approval and risk priority number. Lean and Six Sigma workflow analysis revealed average scan approval times of 920 minutes for CT and 834 minutes for MRI, with report approval having a maximum risk priority number of 490.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: