Why the study?
Diabetes distress is underrecognized and associated with poor outcomes, motivating evaluation of a telehealth intervention to reduce distress levels.
Does a collaborative, goal-setting, and behavioral telehealth intervention reduce diabetes distress in individuals with uncontrolled diabetes and depression?
Population
225 individuals with uncontrolled diabetes and depression living at least 20 miles from a Veteran's Affairs medical center
Comparison
12-month collaborative, goal-setting, and behavioral telehealth intervention (HOPE) vs Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) with education
Design
Randomized clinical trial
Follow-up
12 months
Key result
The HOPE telehealth intervention trended toward improving overall diabetes distress compared with enhanced usual care, but the difference was not statistically significant (β=6.96; P=0.13).
Authors
Loading...
Does not support telehealth adoption for diabetes distress; leaves open benefit in larger or refined trials.
RCT (n=225)
randomized
Does a collaborative, goal-setting, and behavioral telehealth intervention reduce diabetes distress in individuals with uncontrolled diabetes and depression?
Effect estimate: β 6.96
p-value: p=0.13
A 12-month telehealth intervention for patients with uncontrolled diabetes and depression yielded clinically meaningful but not statistically significant overall reductions in diabetes distress over time compared to enhanced usual care.
Vaughan et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in uncontrolled diabetes and depression (n=225). Healthy Outcomes through Patient Empowerment (HOPE) telehealth intervention vs. Enhanced Usual Care (EUC) with education was evaluated on Overall diabetes distress (PAID total score) over 12 months (β 6.96, p=0.13). The HOPE telehealth intervention trended toward improving overall diabetes distress compared with enhanced usual care, but the difference was not statistically significant (β=6.96; P=0.13).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: