Key result
In-hospital antiplatelet therapy for COVID-19 is linked to ~61% lower mortality.
Why the study?
Autopsy studies showed high prevalence of platelet-fibrin-rich microthrombi in COVID-19, motivating evaluation of antiplatelet therapy safety and efficacy in hospitalized patients.
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19?
Cohort (n=7,824)
Yes
Does antiplatelet therapy reduce in-hospital mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19?
Relative Risk: 0.39 (95% CI 0.32–0.48)
Absolute Event Rate: 18% vs 19%
p-value: p=<0.01
In-hospital antiplatelet therapy in COVID-19 patients is associated with a significantly lower mortality risk and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation without increasing bleeding risk.
Should not yet change practice for COVID-19; leaves open confirmation of mortality benefit in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Standard therapy for COVID-19 is continuously evolving. Autopsy studies showed high prevalence of platelet-fibrin-rich microthrombi in several organs. The aim of the study was therefore to evaluate the safety and efficacy of antiplatelet therapy (APT) in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 and its impact on survival. METHODS: 7824 consecutive patients with COVID-19 were enrolled in a multicentre international prospective registry (Health Outcome Predictive Evaluation-COVID-19 Registry). Clinical data and in-hospital complications were recorded. Data on APT, including aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs, were obtained for each patient. RESULTS: During hospitalisation, 730 (9%) patients received single APT (93%, n=680) or dual APT (7%, n=50). Patients treated with APT were older (74±12 years vs 63±17 years, p<0.01), more frequently male (68% vs 57%, p<0.01) and had higher prevalence of diabetes (39% vs 16%, p<0.01). Patients treated with APT showed no differences in terms of in-hospital mortality (18% vs 19%, p=0.64), need for invasive ventilation (8.7% vs 8.5%, p=0.88), embolic events (2.9% vs 2.5% p=0.34) and bleeding (2.1% vs 2.4%, p=0.43), but had shorter duration of mechanical ventilation (8±5 days vs 11±7 days, p=0.01); however, when comparing patients with APT versus no APT and no anticoagulation therapy, APT was associated with lower mortality rates (log-rank p<0.01, relative risk 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.94). On multivariable analysis, in-hospital APT was associated with lower mortality risk (relative risk 0.39, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.48, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: APT during hospitalisation for COVID-19 could be associated with lower mortality risk and shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, without increased risk of bleeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04334291.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santoro et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in COVID-19 (n=7,824). Antiplatelet therapy (APT) vs. No antiplatelet therapy was evaluated on In-hospital mortality (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.48, p=<0.01). In-hospital antiplatelet therapy for COVID-19 was associated with a significantly lower mortality risk on multivariable analysis (RR 0.39; 95% CI 0.32-0.48; p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: