Key result
Positive T wave in lead aVR predicts ~6-fold higher cardiac event risk in peripartum cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
The clinical courses of peripartum cardiomyopathy are markedly heterogeneous and the prognostic role of positive T wave in lead aVR in PPCM was unknown.
Does the presence of a positive T wave in lead aVR predict adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=82)
Does the presence of a positive T wave in lead aVR predict adverse cardiac outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy?
Odds Ratio: 6.21 (95% CI 1.45–26.51)
p-value: p=0.014
A positive T wave in lead aVR on presentation ECG is a strong independent predictor of adverse cardiac events in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy.
May aid ECG risk stratification in peripartum cardiomyopathy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is an uncommon complication of pregnancy. Clinical courses of PPCM are markedly heterogeneous. Positive T waves in lead aVR (TaVR) are shown to be associated with adverse cardiac events in several cardiovascular diseases. We aimed to investigate the prevalence and prognostic role of positive TaVR in patients with PPCM. METHODS: A total of 82 patients (mean age 29.1 ± 6.3 years) with the diagnosis of PPCM were enrolled. Presentation electrocardiogram (ECG) was investigated for presence of a positive TaVR. The median follow-up duration was 67.0 months. The primary endpoint was defined as composite cardiac events, including cardiac death, arrhythmic events, or persistent left ventricular systolic dysfunction. RESULTS: Patients with positive T wave in lead aVR showed higher rates for persistent left ventricular systolic dysfunction, arrhythmic events, and cardiac death compared to patients without it. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, after adjusting for other confounding factors, the presence of positive TaVR was found to be as an independent and strong predictor of primary composite endpoint (odds ratio 6.21, 95% CI 1.45-26.51; p = 0.014). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, both primary and secondary endpoints occurred more frequently in the positive TaVR group. Using the cut-off level of 0.25 mV, T-wave amplitude in lead aVR predicted primary endpoint with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: Positive T wave in lead aVR, as a simple and feasible electrocardiographic marker, seems to be a novel predictor of adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with PPCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ekizler et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) (n=82). Positive T wave in lead aVR vs. Absence of positive T wave in lead aVR was evaluated on Composite cardiac events, including cardiac death, arrhythmic events, or persistent left ventricular systolic dysfunction (OR 6.21, 95% CI 1.45-26.51, p=0.014). The presence of a positive T wave in lead aVR was an independent predictor of composite cardiac events in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy (OR 6.21; 95% CI 1.45-26.51; p=0.014).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: