Objective: To identify admission-day factors associated with 1-year mortality in adults hospitalized with a chronic wound of any etiology, and to develop and internally validate a model pairing the red cell distribution width–albumin ratio (RAR) with the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI). Approach: In a single-center retrospective cohort reported per Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology and Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis + Artificial Intelligence, adults admitted for a chronic wound (2021–2024) were analyzed at first admission ( n = 584). Admission markers were compared by area under the curve; a logistic model of RAR and ACCI was internally validated by bootstrapping and applied unchanged to a later same-center cohort ( n = 124) for exploratory temporal evaluation. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality. Results: Fifty-three patients (9.1%) died within 1 year. Pressure ulcers carried the highest mortality; the strongest comorbid markers were prior intensive care, dementia, and cardiopulmonary disease. RAR discriminated best, ahead of its components, albumin and red cell distribution width. The two-variable model showed strong discrimination (optimism-corrected C-statistic 0.855) and good calibration, stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk tiers (observed mortality 1.3%, 9.0%, and 36.8%); a high admission RAR (≥5.2) or low albumin (<3.0 g/dL) likewise flagged high-risk patients. In an exploratory same-center temporal evaluation, discrimination was similar; calibration was imprecise. Innovation: This provides a simple, admission-day, patient-level 1-year mortality model for mixed-etiology chronic-wound inpatients, a group for whom admission-day mortality tools have been lacking. Conclusion: Two routine admission-day variables estimated 1-year mortality in chronic-wound inpatients well enough to separate risk groups on the day of admission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rador et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: