Key result
Eight sessions of psychoeducation improve mental health scores vs routine care in CHD patients.
Why the study?
Patients with coronary heart disease are at high risk for mental health disorders, but psychoeducation has been limitedly used in this population.
Does psychoeducation improve mental health in patients with coronary heart disease?
RCT (n=70)
randomly assigned
No
Does psychoeducation improve mental health in patients with coronary heart disease?
p-value: p=0.0001
An eight-session psychoeducation program significantly improved mental health scores in patients with coronary heart disease compared to routine care.
Supports integrating psychoeducation into CHD care; confirms efficacy of structured psychosocial interventions in cardiac patients.
BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary heart disease are at high risk for mental health disorders, such as depression and anxiety. Psychoeducation is a well-known intervention for psychiatric patients, but its use has been limited in other health conditions, such as coronary heart disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of psychoeducation on mental health in coronary heart disease patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial included 70 patients with coronary heart disease at Shahid Beheshti hospital, in Kashan, Iran, in 2014. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: the experimental group, which received eight sessions of psychoeducation, and the control group, which received routine care. Data were collected with the Goldberg mental health questionnaire (GHQ) and were analyzed using independent and paired t-tests performed with SPSS version 16. RESULTS: The means of overall GHQ scores were significantly decreased post-test in the intervention group, and the differences between the two groups were statistically significant in the overall GHQ scores (P = 0.0001). A significant difference was observed between the mean GHQ scores of the intervention group prior to and after the psychoeducational program (PEP) intervention (30 ± 4.66 vs. 20.50 ± 3.30) (P = 0.0001). No significant changes were observed in the control group pre- and post-test (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Psychoeducation resulted in improved mental health in patients with coronary heart disease. Therefore, it is recommended that this approach be performed as a complementary, effective, non-invasive, low-cost nursing intervention to reduce psychological problems in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bashiri et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in Coronary Heart Disease (n=70). Psychoeducation vs. Routine care was evaluated on Overall Goldberg mental health questionnaire (GHQ) score (p=0.0001). Eight sessions of psychoeducation significantly improved overall mental health scores in patients with coronary heart disease compared to routine care (P=0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: