Key result
Abbreviated ultrasound cuts epidural placement time ~31% versus palpation in severely obese parturients.
Why the study?
Lumbar epidural placement is challenging in severely obese parturients due to body habitus, and this population is under-represented in studies assessing ultrasonography for neuraxial block placement.
Does an abbreviated ultrasound exam reduce the time required for lumbar epidural placement in severely obese parturients?
RCT (n=150)
randomized
No
Does an abbreviated ultrasound exam reduce the time required for lumbar epidural placement in severely obese parturients?
Absolute Event Rate: 6.2% vs 9%
p-value: p=<0.01
An abbreviated ultrasound exam to identify midline in severely obese parturients significantly reduces the time and number of needle passes required for lumbar epidural placement.
Supports abbreviated ultrasound for midline identification in obese parturients; extends RCT evidence for targeted ultrasound in difficult neuraxial anesthesia.
BACKGROUND: Due to body habitus, lumbar epidural placement can be challenging in severely obese parturients. Several studies have been published assessing the usefulness of ultrasonography in the placement of neuraxial blocks. One patient population that is under-represented in these studies is the severely obese parturient. We sought to determine if performing an abbreviated ultrasound exam of the lumbar spine to determine midline by locating spinous process could facilitate lumbar epidural placement in severely obese parturients. METHODS: One hundred fifty patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥35 kg/m2 were randomized into two groups. The palpation (P) group had midline identified by the traditional palpation technique. The ultrasonography (U) group had midline identified by ultrasound visualization of the spinous process in the transverse plane. Midline identification and epidural placement were done by both junior and senior anesthesiology residents at our teaching institution. RESULTS: Data were analyzed on all 150 patients. BMI was similar in the U and P groups (43.3 vs. 44.4 kg/m2, P=0.359). Time for epidural placement (6.2 vs. 9.0 minutes, P<0.01) and total procedure time (6.9 vs. 9.5 minutes, P<0.01) were significantly less in the U group. The number of needle passes (2.1 vs. 2.8, P=0.02) was also less in the U group. There was no significant difference in the failure rates of the U and P groups (4.0% vs. 9.3%, P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: The use of an abbreviated ultrasound exam to identify midline in severely obese parturients can reduce the time required for lumbar epidural placement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tubinis et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Severely obese parturients requiring lumbar epidural placement (n=150). Abbreviated ultrasound exam vs. Traditional palpation technique was evaluated on Time for epidural placement (minutes) (p=<0.01). An abbreviated ultrasound exam to identify midline in severely obese parturients significantly reduced the time for epidural placement compared to traditional palpation (6.2 vs. 9.0 minutes, P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: