Key result
CMR identifies cardiomyopathy with ~87% sensitivity and high specificity.
Why the study?
Ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies have become a worldwide epidemic with increasing impact on healthcare systems, necessitating evaluation of diagnostic tools like CMR.
What is the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for diagnosing cardiomyopathy?
Systematic Review (n=12)
What is the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for diagnosing cardiomyopathy?
CMR has high sensitivity (86.75%) and specificity (81.75%) in diagnosing different types of cardiomyopathy, supporting its use for diagnosis and prognosis.
CMR supports reliable cardiomyopathy diagnosis and subtyping in practice; extends pooled diagnostic evidence while needing broader prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Myocardial pathologies are significant causes of morbidity and mortality in patients worldwide. Ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies have become a worldwide epidemic of the 21st century with an increasing impact on health care systems. The 2012 European Society of Cardiology and 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association guidelines provide current therapy guidance to reduce mortality and morbidity. METHODS: This was a systematic review involving cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) studies for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy from January 2013 to April 2017. Out of 62 reviewed studies, only 12 were included in our study. RESULTS: The average sensitivity and specificity of CMR in the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy was 86.75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70.30% to 92.58%) and 81.75% (95% CI, 73.0% to 87.6%), respectively, and the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 80.17% and 86.75%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, our study shows that CMR has high sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in diagnosing different types of cardiomyopathy. CMR may be used to differentiate types of cardiomyopathy, accurately quantify the chamber dimensions, volumes, and cardiac function, which make it useful for prognosis as well.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henry Mayala (2018) conducted a systematic review in Cardiomyopathy (n=12). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated on Diagnosis of cardiomyopathy (Sensitivity 86.75%, 95% CI 70.30-92.58). Cardiac magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of cardiomyopathy showed an average sensitivity of 86.75% (95% CI 70.30-92.58%) and specificity of 81.75% (95% CI 73.0-87.6%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: