Cardiac magnetic resonance is a critical imaging modality for diagnosing the etiology and determining the prognosis of nonischemic cardiomyopathies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CMR aids etiology and prognosis assessment in nonischemic cardiomyopathies; confirms reference role while leaving protocol standardization open.
Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable tool for the evaluation of patients with, or at risk for, heart failure and has a growing impact on diagnosis, clinical management, and decision making. Through its ability to characterize the myocardium by using multiple different imaging parameters, it provides insight into the etiology of the underlying heart failure and its prognosis. CMR is widely accepted as the reference standard for quantifying chamber size and ejection fraction. Additionally, tissue characterization techniques such as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and other quantitative parameters such as T₁ mapping, both native and with measurement of extracellular volume fraction; T₂ mapping; and T₂* mapping have been validated against histological findings in a wide range of clinical scenarios. In particular, the pattern of LGE in the myocardium can help determine the underlying etiology of the heart failure. The presence and extent of LGE determine prognosis in many of the nonischemic cardiomyopathies. The use of CMR should increase as its utility in characterization and assessment of prognosis in cardiomyopathies is increasingly recognized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patel et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: