Key result
CMR guides crucial noninvasive diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy planning in HF and cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
This article aimed to highlight the current diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in the management of heart failure and prospective future applications.
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improve the diagnosis and prognostication of patients with heart failure?
Does cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improve the diagnosis and prognostication of patients with heart failure?
CMR is a highly accurate, noninvasive imaging modality that provides crucial diagnostic and prognostic information, including tissue characterization and precise LVEF quantification, for patients with heart failure.
Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome resulting from structural cardiac remodeling and altered function that impairs tissue perfusion. This article aimed to highlight the current diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in the management of HF and prospective future applications. Reviewed are the physics associated with CMR, its use in ischemic and non-ischemic causes of HF, and its role in quantifying left ventricular ejection fraction. It also emphasized that CMR allows for noninvasive morphologic and functional assessment, tissue characterization, blood flow, and perfusion evaluation in patients with suspected or diagnosed HF. CMR has become a crucial instrument for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy planning in patients with HF and cardiomyopathy due to its accuracy in quantifying cardiac volumes and ejection fraction (considered the gold standard) as well as native and post-contrast myocardial tissue characterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elmadi et al. (2022) conducted a review in Heart failure. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was evaluated. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging serves as a crucial noninvasive modality for the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy planning in patients with heart failure and cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: