Key result
New framework classifies excessive LV trabeculation into three phenotypes, challenging the arrest-of-compaction hypothesis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We envisage the scientific community will move away from the term 'LV non-compaction', which is misleading, to use 'excessive trabeculation' which can be observed across a wide spectrum of health and disease states. The recommendation from this work has a substantial clinical impact as it can reduce harm to patients and people often wrongly labelled to have a specific disease. We also hope that this review article and expert consensus will lead to further research to better characterise the genetic basis and physiological impact of excessive trabeculation in otherwise normal individuals.”
“Based on the available evidence, this expert consensus provides pragmatic recommendations on the clinical management of adults with incidental excessive trabeculation and those diagnosed with hypertrophic or dilated cardiomyopathy along with excessive trabeculation. Evidence is relatively sparse in children with excessive trabeculation, so this population may follow a different clinical trajectory – hence the need for further research.”
This review provides a new conceptual framework for understanding left ventricular noncompaction, moving away from the classical arrest-of-compaction hypothesis toward a differential growth model.
Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) has long been treated as a distinct cardiomyopathy defined by excessive left ventricular trabeculation. Human developmental studies no longer support the classical arrest-of-compaction hypothesis and instead favor differential growth of the trabecular and compact layers. Excessive trabeculation is also observed in inherited and developmental cardiomyopathies, as a change accompanying other cardiac disease, in asymptomatic individuals, and reversibly in pregnancy and in athletes. Morphology alone is therefore insufficient to define a disease entity. This narrative, conceptual review re-examines ventricular wall formation, the mechanisms producing excessive trabeculation, genetic heterogeneity, and clinical phenotypes and shows that no single axis organizes LVNC unequivocally. Integrating these elements, excessive trabeculation is organized into three clinical pathophysiologic contexts: primary cardiomyopathy with hypertrabeculation, in which overt cardiomyopathy is not sufficiently explained by another underlying disease or by pathological hemodynamic loading; disease-associated hypertrabeculation; and hypertrabeculation without overt cardiomyopathy. The purpose of this organization is to isolate a candidate disease entity that can be tested, using the attribution step by which current definitions of hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy are themselves constructed. The framework is built on three axes: category, descriptive phenotypic group, and risk modifiers. It is hypothesis-generating; operationalization, interobserver reproducibility, prospective outcomes and external validation remain to be realized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keiichi Hirono (2026) conducted a review in Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). Left ventricular noncompaction was evaluated. Excessive left ventricular trabeculation is organized into three clinical pathophysiologic contexts in a proposed conceptual framework that challenges the classical arrest-of-compaction hypothesis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: