Key result
A proposed diagnostic algorithm based on a literature review aims to distinguish between hypertrabeculation phenotype, non-compaction phenotype, and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.
Provides a proposed diagnostic algorithm to differentiate benign hypertrabeculation from true left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.
Proposed algorithm to differentiate LVNC phenotypes; leaves open clinical adoption without prospective validation.
Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) is an increasingly recognised cardiomyopathy characterised by excessive trabeculation and deep intertrabecular recesses in direct communication with the left ventricular cavity. In LVNC, hypertrabeculation has been associated with heart failure, ventricular arrhythmia, and systemic thromboembolism. However, hypertrabeculation alone is not sufficient to define a subject as at risk for such complications and thus should not be sufficient to diagnose LVNC. Despite several studies having investigated parameters to predict adverse cardiovascular events, physicians have no effective tools to differentiate between clinically silent hypertrabeculation and LVNC. The aim of this paper was to review literature on LVNC diagnostic criteria and to provide an easy and accessible diagnostic algorithm to distinguish between hypertrabeculation phenotype, non-compaction phenotype and LVNC cardiomyopathy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vergani et al. (2019) conducted a review in Left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC). Diagnostic algorithm was evaluated. A proposed diagnostic algorithm based on a literature review aims to distinguish between hypertrabeculation phenotype, non-compaction phenotype, and left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: