Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper begins with verifying, successively, the following propositions. First, the characteristics of non-rivalry and unexcludability exist in externality as well as in public goods. For this the Civil Code concept of “Unjust Enrichment” is utilized. Second, non-rivalry and unexcludability jointly incur noncompensation. Third, public good is more adequately defined while markets fail than while governments intervene, and its definition should mention the existence of third-party effect. Fourth, externality equals in concept with public good, till varying radii of third-party effect do them part. Consequently, based on the verifications, new definitions of externality and public good are constructed by employing such concepts as existence and radius of third-party effect, noncompensation, non-rivalry, and unexcludability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 9 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: