Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The effect of peritubular and luminal pH changes on hydraulic conductance, (Lp, 10(-7) cm X s-1 X atm-1) in the isolated perfused rabbit cortical collecting tubule (CCT) was tested at 37 degrees C before and after administration of 20 microU/ml vasopressin or 10(-4) M 8-[p-chlorophenylthio]-adenosine cyclic monophosphate (8-CPT-cAMP). In vasopressin experiments when bath pH was changed from 7.58 to 7.16 or from 7.58 to 6.70, mean Lp decreased from 249 +/- 32 to 199 +/- 23 (n = 5; P less than 0.01) and from 231 +/- 38 to 201 +/- 36 (n = 5; NS), respectively. In contrast, in 8-CPT-cAMP experiments when bath [HCO3] was kept constant while CO2 was elevated the hydroosmotic response was increased. Using 2.5 mM HCO3, Lp at 0.4% CO2 was 275 +/- 15 and at 6% CO2 it was 352 +/- 50 (n = 4; paired t test; P less than 0.05). At 8.5 and 21.5 mM HCO3 raising CO2 from 2 to 13% and from 4 to 32% increased Lp from 237 +/- 71 to 410 +/- 32 (n = 4; paired t test; P less than 0.05) and from 282 +/- 45 to 449 +/- 63 (n = 6; paired t test; P less than 0.001), respectively. Reducing luminal pH from 7.40 to 5.40 had no effect on either vasopressin- or cAMP-induced changes in Lp. Accordingly, lowering the bath pH by increasing the PCO2 at constant [HCO3] markedly stimulates the response to 8-CPT-cAMP, whereas lowering the bath pH by reducing [HCO3] inhibits the vasopressin response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lorenzen et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: