Key result
Patients are ~2-fold more likely than providers to consider hospital readmissions preventable, citing system issues.
Why the study?
Patients' and providers' views on contributors to 30-day hospital readmissions differ and need comparison to understand preventability perspectives.
Do patients and providers have differing views on the preventability and contributors to 30-day hospital readmissions?
Population
178 readmitted patients at a single tertiary care academic hospital
Comparison
Patient perspectives vs provider and RN case manager perspectives on readmission contributors
Design
Qualitative interview survey analysis
Follow-up
30-day readmission hospitalization period
Authors
Loading...
Patient-provider misalignment on readmission preventability may affect communication; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before informing interventions.
Observational (n=178)
No
Do patients and providers have differing views on the preventability and contributors to 30-day hospital readmissions?
Absolute Event Rate: 58% vs 29%
p-value: p=<0.0001
There is a significant disconnect between patients and providers regarding the causes of hospital readmissions, with patients frequently identifying hospital system issues that providers overlook.
Smeraglio et al. (2019) conducted an observational in 30-day hospital readmissions (n=178). Patient perspective on readmission preventability vs. Provider perspective was evaluated on The view that the readmission was preventable (p=<0.0001). Patients were significantly more likely than discharging providers to view their 30-day hospital readmission as preventable (58% vs 29%, p<0.0001), frequently citing hospital system issues.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: