Background In many low and middle-income countries (LMICs), diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is hindered by limited access to gold-standard instruments, like the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2 (ADOS-2), due to cost, training, and licensing barriers. The Autism Mental Status Exam (AMSE) is a brief, observational tool designed to structure clinical observation and support diagnostic decision-making in specialist settings where comprehensive assessments are unavailable. Objective To adapt the AMSE into Indonesian (AMSE-INA) and validate it as a pre-diagnostic tool for use by specialists in secondary/tertiary care settings in Indonesia, where access to gold-standard instruments is constrained. Methods This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study comprised two phases: (1) rigorous cross-cultural adaptation following Beaton et al. guidelines, and (2) psychometric validation involving 174 children (aged 18 months–18 years) referred to a developmental specialist clinic. All participants underwent assessment with the AMSE-INA, the Indonesian version of the Childhood Autism Rating Scale-2 (CARS-2 ST), and a best-estimate clinical diagnosis (BECD) based on DSM-5 criteria by an experienced consultant blinded to AMSE scores. Reliability (internal consistency, inter-rater, test-retest), validity (content, concurrent, discriminant), and diagnostic accuracy (ROC analysis) were evaluated. Results AMSE-INA demonstrated excellent inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.97) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.96). Internal consistency was moderate (α = 0.66), consistent with its multidimensional construct. Content validity was excellent (I-CVI = 1.00). Concurrent validity with CARS-2 ST was strong (r = 0.85, p < 0.001). ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–1.00). A cut-off score of ≥6 provided optimal diagnostic utility for specialist settings: sensitivity 88.9%, specificity 94.7%, PPV 95.7%, NPV 86.6%. Conclusion AMSE-INA is a reliable, valid, and culturally appropriate pre-diagnostic tool that can assist specialists in establishing an accurate ASD diagnosis in resource-limited settings. By providing a structured observational framework, it bridges the diagnostic gap when gold-standard tools are inaccessible, improving early intervention access in Indonesia and similar settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marudur et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: