Preclinical study demonstrates that membrane-coated metal-organic framework nanovaccines confer profound protection against Giardia lamblia in mice, highlighting a novel mucosal immunization platform.
Giardiasis caused by the intestinal protozoan Giardia lamblia is a major global cause of diarrheal disease and malabsorption particularly affecting young children and populations in low- and middle-income countries. Despite evidence of immunity after infection, no human vaccine is available. Induction of effective mucosal immunity is critical for protection against this lumen-dwelling pathogen, but has been hampered by the lack of suitable adjuvants. We show here in a murine model that cyclic di-(3′,5′)-guanosine monophosphate (CDG) is a potent mucosal adjuvant for immunization against G. lamblia with a defined antigen, α1-giardin. Based on this observation, we developed a novel nanovaccine strategy that employs metal-organic framework (MOF) nanoparticles loaded with CDG and cloaked with native G. lamblia membranes. These particles enable simultaneous delivery of multiple antigens in their native form together with a powerful mucosal adjuvant. CDG-loaded MOFs exhibited efficient cargo encapsulation and controlled release and strong immune-stimulatory activity in dendritic cells. Intranasal immunization of mice with G. lamblia membrane-coated CDG-MOFs elicited robust parasite-specific IgG responses and conferred profound protection against G. lamblia infection that was superior to that achieved with a single defined antigen. Immunization-induced protection was dependent on the CDG receptor STING and required CD4 + T cells but was independent of secretory IgA. These findings demonstrate that MOF-based nanovaccines incorporating a cyclic dinucleotide represent an effective platform for inducing protective mucosal immunity against giardiasis. More broadly, this approach offers a versatile strategy for delivering hydrophilic adjuvants and multivalent antigens for vaccination against mucosal pathogens of the gastrointestinal tract.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krishnan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: