Key result
Myocardial inflammation resolution on CMR fails to guarantee AV conduction recovery in myocarditis.
Why the study?
Does serial CMR imaging guide diagnosis and device selection in patients with complete AV block due to acute myocarditis?
Case Report (n=4)
Does serial CMR imaging guide diagnosis and device selection in patients with complete AV block due to acute myocarditis?
Serial CMR imaging in patients with acute myocarditis and AV block can help identify the underlying etiology, monitor disease progression, and guide the timing and selection of permanent pacing devices.
May warrant caution in using CMR inflammation resolution alone to time permanent pacing in myocarditis; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Background Atrioventricular (AV) conduction disorders are a relatively rare complication in acute myocarditis. Although frequently transient in nature, persistent AV block has been reported. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is critical in the diagnostic work-up and follow-up of myocarditis. This case series describes the use of CMR imaging to guide diagnosis, device selection, and disease monitoring. Case Summary Four patients with complete AV block due to acute myocarditis underwent serial CMR imaging for diagnosis, disease monitoring and device timing and selection. Recovery of AV conduction was variable in the presented cases. CMR imaging was able to identify two distinct clinical scenarios of disease progress and subsequent AV conduction recovery. First, two patients (cases 1 and 2) in which resolution of myocardial inflammation was paralleled by resolution of AV conduction disorders. Second, a patient (case 3) in which AV block persisted even after resolution of inflammation due to the development of myocardial fibrosis. However, in one patient (case 4) CMR was unable to adequately detect the disease progress, i.e. a patient with persistent AV block despite resolution of inflammation and no signs of myocardial fibrosis. Discussion This case series illustrates the variable clinical course of AV conduction disorders in the context of acute myocarditis. CMR imaging was essential in the identification of underlying myocarditis, offering insights in the disease course and may be therefore be used as an adjunctive tool for device selection. However mismatch between CMR findings and AV conduction disorders may occur and warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bom et al. (2026) conducted a case report in Atrioventricular block in acute myocarditis (n=4). Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging was evaluated on Correlation between resolution of myocardial inflammation on CMR and recovery of AV conduction. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in four patients with myocarditis and AV block demonstrated that resolution of myocardial inflammation does not always guarantee recovery of AV conduction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: