Leaf area index (LAI) is a key biophysical parameter for characterizing orchard canopy structure and growth status, and it is closely associated with crop productivity. In trellis-trained orchards, severe branch overlap and persistent background interference make it difficult to delineate single-plant observation boundaries, while radiometric drift across multi-temporal observations further reduces feature comparability. To address these issues, this study proposes a dynamic ROI-constrained framework for single-plant LAI estimation from UAV multispectral imagery. First, relative radiometric calibration based on pseudo-invariant features was applied to reduce inter-date spectral bias and establish a unified radiometric baseline for multi-temporal analysis. Second, a dynamic ROI extraction algorithm was developed using dual constraints from the spatial distance percentile (P) and the local spectral purity threshold (Q). Parameter ablation results showed that the P90_Q70 combination achieved the best balance between retaining core canopy information and suppressing background noise. Compared with the best fixed-radius strategy (3.00 m), this scheme improved R 2 from 0.700 to 0.766 and reduced RMSE to 0.122. On this basis, spectral vegetation indices and near-infrared texture features were integrated to construct a multidimensional feature set. The gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) model achieved the best predictive performance, with R 2 = 0.772, RMSE = 0.120, and RPD = 2.094, and was further used to generate high-resolution LAI maps of the orchard. These results indicate that the combination of dynamic boundary constraints and spectral purity screening can improve the robustness of single-plant feature extraction in trellis-trained kiwifruit orchards and provide a practical reference for quantitative remote sensing of other densely closed orchard systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: