Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aims to understand how local groups, conceptually known as communities in academic literature, have been progressing toward becoming Smart Communities by examining the practices and interactions that support this transformation. The topic is relevant as cities increasingly seek bottom-up approaches to innovation and inclusion. The analysis draws on the case of several communities of the +4D Sustainable Urban Regeneration Program in Porto Alegre, Brazil, which are in their process to become Smart Communities. A theoretical review of smart community literature was conducted to clarify the concept, followed by data collection through participant observation, 25 semi-structured interviews with community leaders, members, association staff, Porto Alegre City Hall representatives, and residents, and document analysis. The study identified seven interrelated characteristics through which Smart Community development can be observed. These elements help shape communities that are more cohesive, build shared capacities, sustain long-term collaboration, engage in meaningful dialogue with public authorities, and advance locally driven innovation. Based on these findings, the study develops a framework representing the relational dynamics of Smart Community development and contributes to the practical application of community governance and transition theories in smart urban ecosystems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lopes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: