The present study examined the factor structure, measurement invariance across sex and language, concurrent and discriminant validity and achievement-related criterion validity of the eight-item mathematics self-concept scale from TIMSS 2023 in a sample of 4463 eighth-grade students in Hong Kong. Cronbach’s alpha was high (α = 0.86) and a confirmatory factor model accounting for wording-related method variance fit the data substantially better than a strictly unidimensional model. Equivalence testing revealed that the mathematics self-concept scale achieved strict measurement invariance across both sex and language groups. Correlations provided strong concurrent/convergent evidence with liking mathematics (r = 0.59) and moderate evidence with valuing mathematics (r = 0.36), discriminant evidence through a small association with science self-concept (r = 0.20), and achievement-related criterion evidence through a positive association with mathematics achievement (B = 10.65) using a multilevel modeling approach. Findings support the mathematics self-concept scale’s practical utility for describing students’ perceived mathematical competence and for making cross-group comparisons while cautioning against overreliance on a strict unidimensional structure that ignores negative wording effects. Implications, limitations and future directions of the present study are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Onur Ramazan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: