The simultaneous adulteration of UHT milk with multiple compounds presents analytical challenges due to spectral overlap, matrix effects, and collinearity. This study evaluated ATR-FTIR spectroscopy combined with PCA and analyte-specific PLS1 models, aiming to screen for and quantify seven adulterants and empirically assess PLS1 model behavior under multicomponent interference. PCA revealed distinct score-space patterns among the evaluated groups, although the observed separation could also include brand-related matrix effects. For independent samples containing a single adulterant, PLS1 models demonstrated satisfactory predictive performance for sodium hypochlorite, sodium bicarbonate, formaldehyde, urea, and sodium hydroxide (R 2 P > 0.91; RPD ≥ 3.0), whereas starch and hydrogen peroxide showed inferior predictive capacity (R 2 P = 0.71–0.85; RPD = 2.00–2.79). Under multicomponent conditions, however, model selectivity decreased markedly, producing analyte-dependent false-positive and false-negative responses in the symmetric scenario, while predictions in the asymmetric scenario were sporadic and unstable. These results indicate that ATR-FTIR combined with PCA holds promise for exploratory screening and that PLS1 enables the prediction of specific analytes within defined calibration domains. Nevertheless, single-adulterant PLS1 models are unreliable for quantifying adulterants under the multicomponent scenarios evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junior et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: