Paper I studies a class of candidate finite-time collapse mechanisms for the three-dimensional incompressible Navier–Stokes equations. In this class, an axisymmetric collapsing vortex is coupled to a non-axisymmetric interaction field whose Reynolds stress acts on the mean flow. The class is organized by a single parameter, the exterior circulation exponent α. The results hold under explicitly stated premises: a source-free leading core, a strained-core width law, saturated self-similar supply and axial balance. Circulation growth and vanishing core energy hold together exactly when 0 < α < 1/3. The cut-dependent collapse Reynolds number cancels from this criterion. For the specified interaction-wave family, covariance realizability is governed by a circular cone aligned with the radial shear. Its exterior parameter satisfies v_s − 2 = α. An exact finite perturbation constructs an active midplane layer. A linear lift gives a stress-free global midplane preparation under a quantified non-resonance condition. Continuation in height is a coupled boundary-value problem. Its axis fold has a quasi-elliptic (2,6) core. The full frozen-window resolvent is bounded below by a quantity that tends to infinity at large height frequency; no power-law rate is claimed. Scope: this paper does not prove that Navier–Stokes solutions blow up. OpenAI's external construction corresponds to α = 2h < 1/50, and it realizes the class only if that construction is correct. Finite-frequency non-resonance, range closure, variable profiles, height continuation and full Navier–Stokes verification are left to Paper II, which is in preparation. No priority is claimed. Files: 00 – Paper I 01 – Claim ledger: the current status of every claim, including corrections to Attachment A 02 – Attachment A: the complete technical manuscript, whose theorem numbers Paper I cites. Superseded intermediate statements are kept and marked. 03 – Attachment B: cone realizability and the midplane construction 04 – Attachment C: global quasimodes of the frozen axis-fold operator 05 – Attachment D: compactness closure and the proof of Theorem 9.60 06 – Attachment E: where the paper's statements about OpenAI's construction appear in its Lean formalization. This is based on reading the Lean source; the Lean build was not run. Code availability: the supporting calculations are at https://github.com/LarCorps/ns-exterior-exponent-calculations. Numerical results are audits and are not used in place of proofs. Use of AI tools: large language model tools, including Anthropic's Claude and OpenAI Astra/Sol, assisted with derivations, symbolic and numerical audits, source verification, and drafting and editing. The author directed the research and takes full responsibility for the content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauri V.N. Korpela (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: