Retrospective cohort study reveals greater serum creatinine elevations with abemaciclib versus palbociclib in advanced breast cancer, suggesting medication-induced filtration artifact.
Introduction Abemaciclib inhibits renal tubular creatinine secretion and can increase serum creatinine without a true reduction in glomerular filtration rate. Direct real-world comparisons with palbociclib using routinely available laboratory markers are limited. Methods We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 56 women with advanced or recurrent hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who initiated palbociclib (n = 29) or abemaciclib (n = 27). Data from January 1, 2018, to June 30, 2026, were extracted. Serum creatinine, creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and the BUN/creatinine ratio were evaluated at baseline and Days 14, 28, 42, and 56 using adjusted generalized estimating equations. Results Drug-by-time interactions were significant for serum creatinine ( P = 0.004), eGFR ( P < 0.001), and the BUN/creatinine ratio ( P = 0.001), but not BUN ( P = 0.080). At Day 14, the adjusted between-group difference in change (abemaciclib minus palbociclib) was 0.180 mg/dL for serum creatinine and −11.4 mL/min/1.73 m 2 for eGFR. The BUN/creatinine ratio difference was not significant at Day 14 but was significant at Days 28 (−5.12), 42 (−4.11), and 56 (−3.83). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent interaction results. Conclusions Abemaciclib showed greater and more persistent changes in serum creatinine, creatinine-based eGFR, and the BUN/creatinine ratio than palbociclib. Serial BUN and BUN/creatinine ratio measurements may provide supportive context for creatinine elevations but cannot exclude true kidney injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koizumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: