Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective study reveals improved weaning weight and reduced diarrhea in tropical dairy calves, suggesting early-life group housing benefits.
This retrospective study evaluated how two early-life management systems influenced calf growth and health in a dairy operation in Coclé, Panamá. The Individual Weaning Management (IWM) system housed calves in large groups (>10 animals) and weaned them individually, whereas the Group Weaning Management (GWM) system maintained smaller, consistent groups (~6 animals) with collective weaning. Data from 149 (Girolando, Guzolando, and crossbred) were analyzed. All calves received standardized nutrition, including milk replacer and concentrate provided at 10% of body weight. Body weights were recorded at birth and weaning, with longitudinal growth assessed in Girolando and Guzolando calves. Mixed-effects modeling identified birth weight, weaning age, and management system as significant predictors of weaning weight. Calves under GWM had significantly higher weaning weights (5.61 ± 1.77 kg; p = 0.0047). However, dietary differences, including the use of corn distillate in IWM, represent a potential confounder. Health outcomes also differed: diarrhea incidence was significantly lower in GWM calves (3.5%) compared with IWM (14.3%). Despite these early advantages, postweaning growth trajectories did not differ between systems (p = 0.867), suggesting compensatory growth in IWM calves. Overall, GWM improved early growth and health and may be preferable in settings with strong biosecurity and health monitoring protocols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: