Experimental study reveals enhanced methane yield using low-coordinated copper single-atom catalysts, indicating the vital role of coordination engineering in solar fuel synthesis.
Photocatalytic CO 2 conversion offers sustainable catalytic pathway for solar fuel production and CO 2 mitigation. However, the mechanism of coordination environment of metal catalytic centers in CO 2 adsorption and the selectivity of intermediates and products remains unclear. Herein, two N‐doped carbon nanosheets hosting coordination‐engineered Cu single atom (referred to as Cu‐N x , where x denotes the number of coordinated N atoms, e.g., Cu‐N 3 and Cu‐N 4 ) were synthesized via a simple two‐step pyrolysis process. The Cu‐N coordination number decreases with increasing pyrolysis temperature. Under visible light irradiation, the optimal catalyst with Cu‐N 3 coordination achieves a CH 4 yield of 219 µmol in 10 h using 5 mg catalyst with a selectivity of 97% in the presence of photosensitizer. In contrast, the high‐coordinated Cu‐N 4 site dominated catalyst exhibits a significantly lower CH 4 yield (58 µmol) and selectivity (93.7%), highlighting the advantage of the Cu‐N 3 motif for efficient CH 4 production. Experimental and theoretical results reveal that low‐coordinated Cu‐N 3 site favors * CHO intermediate via * CO hydrogenation (ΔG = 0.71 eV) rather than * CO desorption (ΔG = 0.83 eV), thereby promoting the selective CH 4 generation during the CO 2 photoreduction. In addition, the Cu‐N 3 coordination enhances CO 2 adsorption and charge transfer from Cu to CO 2 compared to Cu‐N 4 coordination. This work underscores the critical role of atomic‐level coordination engineering in optimizing the catalytic performance of single atom catalysts for efficient and selective solar fuel production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: