This review examines the ballistic resistance of fiber-reinforced cement composites (FRCs) and related cementitious systems for protective structures, with emphasis on projectile–target interaction, penetration and scabbing mechanisms, and the governing roles of material and structural parameters. The synthesis indicates that ballistic resistance is controlled not only by compressive strength but also by the combined effects of dynamic tensile behavior, fracture energy, crack-bridging efficiency, aggregate characteristics, target thickness, projectile characteristics, and structural configuration. Steel and hybrid fiber systems generally provide the most consistent improvements in scabbing suppression and residual integrity, while hard aggregates and multilayer hard–soft–tough arrangements enhance penetration resistance, stress-wave attenuation, and staged energy dissipation. The review also evaluates current numerical approaches, including rate-sensitive constitutive models, cohesive and continuum damage formulations, smoothed particle hydrodynamics, and data-driven methods. Several calibrated and experimentally validated simulations reproduced penetration depth and major damage trends with useful engineering agreement; however, significant challenges remain in representing multi-hit degradation, fiber-scale pull-out, fragment ejection, and interface debonding. In addition, the review highlights the limited suitability of existing ballistic standards for quasi-brittle cementitious systems and emphasizes the need for FRC-specific testing, large-scale validation, and more sustainable protective material design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sukontasukkul et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: