Reflection positivity is a positivity condition on a reflected half-space, and it is not inherited automatically by covariance pieces produced by coarse graining. We isolate a finite-dimensional obstruction for a common projection-type construction. Let H=H₊₋ carry a unitary reflection Θ exchanging the two halves, let C=C^* commute with Θ, and assume Osterwalder--Schrader (OS) positivity on H₊. For a reflection-symmetric orthogonal projection Π that also preserves H₊, we characterize exactly when the projection-sandwich residual C = C - Π C Π remains OS-positive: this holds if and only if the positive-half projection Π₊ commutes with the OS Gram operator W=P₊Θ C P₊. Equivalently, the mixed positive/negative-time commutator block vanishes. This gives a direct algebraic test for projection-type coarse graining. We then record three consequences. First, in the scalar infinite-lattice setting a finite-range, fine-translation-invariant orthogonal projection is necessarily $0$ or id, so nontrivial local projections must break fine translation invariance or leave this class. Second, a null-escape mechanism shows that a projection which sends an OS-null vector to a strictly positive OS-energy direction forces the residual to violate reflection positivity. For the massive free covariance with bond reflection we identify the OS null cone explicitly and obtain its dimension. Third, a complete 4×4 rational example gives a standalone exact failure certificate with positive original covariance and a negative residual OS direction. A larger audited 8×6 block-harmonic computation is retained only as supplementary provenance because the closure archive does not contain the complete projector table required for independent recomputation. The obstruction is deliberately narrow: it applies to projection-sandwich residuals and does not exclude non-projective Markov kernels, conditional expectations, completely positive maps, nonlinear coarse graining, or continuum constructions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao Lin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: