Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Climate-Neutral Districts (CNDs) and Positive Energy Districts (PEDs) have become central concepts in European strategies for climate-neutral cities. Existing research, however, has predominantly interpreted these models from technological and energy-system perspectives, while their governance implications and effects on real-estate investment remain comparatively underexplored. This paper develops a conceptual and interpretative framework that also considers CNDs and PEDs as governance and investment environments shaped by different stakeholder configurations. Methodologically, the study combines an evidence-informed stakeholder and governance framework developed within CapaCITIES 2.0 with an interdisciplinary conceptual interpretation. The framework derives from comparative analysis of Countries’ Self-Assessments and National Action Plans involving 33 consortium participants representing 14 Member States, complemented by interviews, focus-group exchanges, collegial reconciliation, and participant validation. The unit of analysis is the stakeholder configuration associated with a dominant district-transition logic. The analysis positions PEDs as an energy-system-led, rather than energy-system-exclusive, configuration characterised by high infrastructural integration and comparatively strong dependence on specialised technical and regulatory actors. This perspective also highlights the structurally central, yet often under-leveraged, role of real estate actors. The paper concludes that recognising the plurality of district-transition logics provides a more differentiated basis for examining governance arrangements and the conditions under which real-estate stakeholders may move from reactive implementation roles towards greater strategic agency in urban climate transitions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maestosi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: