The Studsvik Core Management System CMS5, consisting of the CASMO5 lattice physics code and the SIMULATE5 three-dimensional nodal simulator, was evaluated against the Nuclear Enersy Agency/Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development TVA (Tennessee Valley Authority) Watts Bar Unit 1 Multi-Physics Multi-Cycle Depletion benchmark. The assessment included cycle 1 zero-power physics tests and full-power boron letdown and flux map comparisons for cycles 1, 2, and 3, using plant measurements as the primary validation basis and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions for complementary verification.The impact of the evaluated nuclear data was investigated using CASMO5 libraries based on ENDF/B-VII.0, ENDF/B-VII.1, and ENDF/B-VIII.1. Transitioning from the ENDF/B-VII.1- to the ENDF/B-VIII.1-based library resulted in a systematic increase in the predicted critical boron concentration, corresponding to a reactivity shift of approximately 114 pcm. In contrast, the control bank worth, reactivity coefficients, boron letdown, and flux map root-mean-square deviations showed only limited sensitivity to the selected library.Overall, the CMS5 predictions showed consistent agreement with both the plant measurements and continuous-energy Monte Carlo reference solutions, indicating reliable multicycle core predictions, with the primary impact of the evaluated nuclear data confined to absolute reactivity predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Georgieva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: