Autochthonous probiotics isolated from the host gastrointestinal tract are considered superior candidates due to their host-adapted characteristics. However, a standardized quantitative approach for integrating multiple in vitro probiotic parameters into a single ranking system for Nile tilapia remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate and rank autochthonous bacterial isolates from the intestine of Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) using multiple in vitro criteria and Z-score normalization. Nine parameters were evaluated and categorized into safety aspects (hemolytic activity and antibiotic resistance), functional properties (antagonistic activity, cell adhesion, cell-surface hydrophobicity, and auto-aggregation), and growth performance (pH tolerance, bile salt tolerance, and specific growth rate at multiple temperatures). The findings were integrated and standardized using Z-score normalization to rank the most promising candidates for subsequent in vivo trials. Thirty-four autochthonous bacteria were isolated from Nile tilapia intestine, of which 15 isolates demonstrated antagonistic activity against at least one tested pathogen ( Aeromonas hydrophila and/or Streptococcus iniae ). Among these 15 isolates, six showed susceptibility to all 12 tested antibiotics (no resistant profile), and ten exhibited non-hemolytic activity on both sheep and tilapia blood agar. Significant differences ( P < 0.05) among isolates were observed in cell-surface hydrophobicity, auto-aggregation, and specific growth rate. All isolates tolerated 6% bile salts, with six isolates tolerating up to 12%, and all Bacillus strains survived exposure to pH 2 after 24 h. Z-score normalization integrating all nine parameters identified Bacillus sp. CHP02 (Z = 1.48), Bacillus sp. RP01 (Z = 1.44), and Bacillus sp. RP00 (Z = 1.30) as the most promising probiotic candidates. These strains warrant further investigation in in vivo trials to confirm their probiotic efficacy in Nile tilapia aquaculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yomla et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: