Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Validation study demonstrates that vessel wall MRI accurately measures translesional pressure ratios in symptomatic ICAS, highlighting its potential as a noninvasive hemodynamic biomarker.
The anatomic stenosis severity of intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) does not reliably reflect lesion-specific hemodynamic impairment, and invasive pressure-wire assessment is technically challenging in the cerebral circulation. This study aimed to develop and validate MRI-derived pressure ratio (M-PR), a noninvasive functional assessment framework for ICAS. Compared with time-of-flight MRA (TOF-MRA)-based lumen reconstruction, high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) could provide more accurate vascular geometry for CFD, while phase-contrast MRA (PC-MRA) could further improve patient-specific boundary conditions. On this basis, we developed two M-PRs using the same PC-MRA-derived boundary conditions but different sources of vascular geometry: TOF-MRA for TOF-PR and HR-VWI for VWI-PR. Correlation with wire-based PR was assessed using Pearson or Spearman analysis, and agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis. Subgroup analyses stratified by stenosis severity were performed. In 42 patients with symptomatic ICAS (mean stenosis, 75.3% ± 7.8%), VWI-PR showed strong correlation (r = 0.87, P < 0.001) and close agreement (mean difference, 0.002 ± 0.09), whereas TOF-PR showed weaker correlation (r = 0.37, P = 0.016) and poorer agreement (-0.17 ± 0.25). TOF-PR underestimated PR in severe stenosis, whereas VWI-PR remained stable across stenosis grades. These findings support VWI-PR as an accurate hemodynamic biomarker for functional assessment of ICAS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: