This study compared the effects of 10% and 30% velocity-loss thresholds during Smith-machine squat training on maximal strength, jumping, and sprint performance in trained female collegiate athletes. Twenty-eight athletes were randomly assigned to a 10% velocity-loss group (VL10) or a 30% velocity-loss group (VL30).Both groups completed 8 weeks of supervised squat training twice weekly, performing four sets at 70% of one-repetition maximum, with each set terminated when the assigned threshold was reached. Smith-machine squat one-repetition maximum (1RM), squat jump (SJ), countermovement jump (CMJ), standing long jump (SLJ), and 30-m sprint (T30) performance were assessed before and after the intervention. Group × time effects were examined using mixed-design analyses of variance. Mean propulsive velocity was higher in VL10, whereas VL30 completed substantially more repetitions per set and per session (all p < 0.001). All performance outcomes improved over time (all p < 0.001). VL30 produced a greater increase in squat 1RM than VL10 (12.5% vs. 9.2%; interaction p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.450). VL10 produced greater improvements in SLJ (interaction p = 0.031, ηp2 = 0.166) and T30 time (interaction p = 0.006, ηp2 = 0.254). Group × time interactions were not significant for SJ (p = 0.127) or CMJ (p = 0.058). Both thresholds improved strength and lower-body performance, but the adaptation pattern differed by outcome. Under the present protocol, VL30 favored 1RM squat strength, whereas VL10 favored SLJ and T30 performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: