Cross-sectional study reveals therapist microaggressions harm working alliance and perceived improvement in minoritized patients, indicating the protective value of addressing these ruptures.
OBJECTIVE: Microaggressions are a common phenomenon affecting minoritized individuals across a wide range of contexts. Their well-known cumulative detrimental effect on mental health raises questions not only in regard to etiological, but also health services research. Initial evidence suggests that microaggressions within psychotherapeutic contexts might harm both process and outcome variables within specific (e.g., racialized) samples. Still, it is unclear whether this is primarily a problem of specific patient groups or rather a generalizable pattern of structural oppression. METHOD: = 707). RESULTS: Across all three samples, a majority of participants reported microaggressions directed at them by their therapists. These experiences were associated with both a weaker working alliance and less perceived improvement from therapy. The effects were attenuated whenever microaggressions were subsequently addressed. CONCLUSION: Microaggressions should be understood as a structural phenomenon probably affecting most minoritized individuals, even within psychotherapies usually considered to be safer-spaces. To protect patients from their harmful effects, therapists should not only strive to minimize the occurrence of microaggressions, but also establish their collaborative management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hausmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: