Generative AI is becoming embedded in everyday communication environments, yet research still often treats its use as a stable adoption outcome rather than as a situated communicative practice. Drawing on Human-Machine Communication and appropriation research, this study investigates students’ ChatGPT use as situated appropriation in everyday life. Empirically, we combine a two-wave experience sampling design with multilevel latent class analysis. The study includes 59 university students and 522 reported ChatGPT-use episodes. We identify four recurring generative-AI communication situations (home-based desktop task use, home-based mobile informal use, workplace desktop use, and public mobile use) as well as three user repertoires that capture how individuals distribute their use across these situations. These findings provide a situational map of students’ ChatGPT appropriation and show that communicative AI use is organized through recurring context configurations and person-level repertoires rather than a single, unitary pattern of use. The study highlights the value of treating situations as a key unit of analysis for understanding how communicative AI becomes embedded in everyday routines, institutional settings, and evolving expectations toward machine-generated contributions. It also demonstrates the usefulness of combining experience sampling with configuration modeling to study human–AI communication in context.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pietschmann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: