Key result
Higher circulating interleukin-40 levels are linked to ~30% greater odds of CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaque.
Why the study?
Are circulating and intraplaque interleukin-40 levels associated with CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
Observational (n=62)
No
Are circulating and intraplaque interleukin-40 levels associated with CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaques in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy?
Odds Ratio: 1.3 (95% CI 1.1–1.54)
p-value: p=0.002
Elevated circulating and intraplaque IL-40 levels correlate with CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaques and lipid-rich necrotic core burden, highlighting its potential as a novel biomarker for plaque vulnerability.
Risk assessment of carotid atherosclerosis is moving beyond stenosis-based evaluation toward the identification of biologically active plaque phenotypes. Although CTA can characterize high-risk plaque morphology, biomarkers that reflect the inflammatory processes underlying these imaging features remain insufficiently defined. This study investigated whether circulating and intraplaque interleukin-40 (IL-40), a recently described immune mediator, is associated with CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaques and their histopathological features. This single-center retrospective observational study included 62 patients with carotid atherosclerotic stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Based on preoperative CTA features and a modified Plaque-RADS-based framework, patients were classified into low-risk plaque ( n = 28) and high-risk plaque ( n = 34) groups. CTA-derived parameters, including luminal stenosis, calcification volume and lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC) volume were quantitatively assessed. Serum IL-40, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels were measured preoperatively and on postoperative day 7. CEA specimens were evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for CD68, α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and IL-40. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to assess factors associated with high-risk plaques. Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between high-risk and low-risk groups. As expected given that LRNC/low-attenuation plaque burden contributed to the imaging-based classification framework, LRNC volume was greater in the high-risk plaque group than in the low-risk plaque group (47.21 ± 8.36 mm³ vs. 35.00 ± 8.01 mm³, P < 0.001), whereas luminal stenosis and calcification volume did not differ significantly. Preoperative serum IL-40, MCP-1, and TNF-α levels were higher in patients with high-risk plaques than in those with low-risk plaques, and levels of all three cytokines were lower on postoperative day 7 than preoperatively. Serum IL-40 positively correlated with LRNC burden ( r = 0.74, P < 0.001). In exploratory multivariable logistic regression, higher IL-40 (OR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.10–1.54, P = 0.002), MCP-1 (OR = 1.23, 95% CI, 1.05–1.44, P = 0.010), and TNF-α (OR = 1.17, 95% CI, 1.01–1.36, P = 0.039) levels remained associated with high-risk plaque status. Histopathological analysis showed larger necrotic cores, greater CD68-positive macrophage infiltration, and stronger IL-40 expression in high-risk plaques. A combined model incorporating IL-40, MCP-1, and TNF-α achieved an area under the curve of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.74–0.94). IL-40 may provide complementary biological information alongside CTA-based plaque characterization and established inflammatory markers and warrants further evaluation in larger prospective cohorts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dang et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Carotid atherosclerotic stenosis (n=62). Interleukin-40 (IL-40) vs. Lower IL-40 levels was evaluated on High-risk plaque status (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.10-1.54, p=0.002). Higher circulating interleukin-40 levels were significantly associated with CTA-defined high-risk carotid plaque status (OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.10-1.54; P=0.002).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: