Deep learning is increasingly used in sixth generation (6G) extremely large-scale MIMO (XL-MIMO) systems to predict beams directly from channel observations to alleviate the overhead of exhaustive nearfield beam search.However, these channel-based observations also provide an attack surface to learned beam-selection models.In this paper, we consider the adversarial robustness of a deep learning-based nearfield beam predictor for XL-MIMO.We train a fully connected neural network to classify 45 near-field candidate beams generated for a simulated 8x8 planar array and evaluate its vulnerability under the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and Projected Gradient Descent (PGD).The beam classification accuracy drops from 74.07%under clean condition to 28.70% under FGSM and 26.11% under PGD at perturbation budget of ε=0.05.Adversarial training improves the respective accuracies to 36.11% and 33.70% while maintaining comparable accuracy on clean data.Specifically, this classification-level degradation does not yield a proportional calculated communication-level impact: the beamforming gain ratio stays close to unity and the derived effective SNR, theoretical BPSK BER and Shannon-based spectral-efficiency estimate only change slightly, with a maximum reported effective-SNR loss of 0.014 dB.Results show that the near-field XL-MIMO beam predictors are vulnerable at the classification level under the input-space threat model considered, while the impact on communication-level is highly dependent on the spatial structure of the beam codebook.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: