The crystal structures of two isomeric urea derivatives—1,1-dimethyl-3-(quinolin-2-yl)urea (1) and 3-(isoquinolin-1-yl)-1,1-dimethylurea (2)—have been investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. These compounds differ in the relative position of the heterocyclic nitrogen atom and the urea substituent. A structural study revealed that the compounds exhibit distinct molecular conformations. In 1, the molecule exists predominantly in a ureide form with a single C–N bond between the quinoline fragment and urea moiety. The ureide group is out of the plane of the quinoline ring, forming an anti-conformation. In contrast, 2 adopts an exocyclic C=N configuration with an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the heterocyclic NH group and ureide oxygen, resulting in a syn-conformation. The supramolecular organization of the compounds also differs: 1 forms one-dimensional chains through N–H···O hydrogen bonds, which further assemble into two-dimensional layers via C–H···O interactions; in 2, the molecules form dimers through intermolecular C–H···O hydrogen bonds. Thus, subtle structural differences between isomeric urea derivatives can lead to distinct molecular conformations, tautomeric forms, and supramolecular organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baykova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: