The treatment landscape of adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) has changed substantially with the introduction of targeted immunotherapeutic agents. Historically, high-risk disease was defined by clinical and cytogenetic features such as older age, elevated leukocyte count, and Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive status. Advances in genomic profiling, together with the use of next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, bispecific T-cell engagers, antibody–drug conjugates, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, have altered both treatment outcomes and risk stratification. Outcomes for patients with Ph-positive B-ALL have improved markedly, particularly with ponatinib- and blinatumomab-based regimens, but several molecularly defined subgroups continue to have poor prognoses. These include IKZF1 plus Ph-positive B-ALL, TP53 -mutated and hypodiploid B-ALL, Ph-like B-ALL, and KMT2A -rearranged B-ALL. Emerging evidence indicates that introducing immunotherapeutic agents early in treatment can improve response quality and rates of measurable residual disease negativity, including in patients with high-risk disease. Relapse nevertheless remains a major challenge, and the optimal integration of novel agents, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, and cellular immunotherapy remains uncertain. This review summarizes the biological and clinical features of the major high-risk molecular subgroups of adult B-ALL and discusses how recent therapeutic advances are redefining risk assessment and treatment strategies in the era of targeted immunotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong Won Baek (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: