Key result
The nsp3-S676T mutation decreased SARS-CoV-2 replication in cells and mice by reducing Paip1 and PABP1 interaction, while a compensatory N-S194L mutation restored the virulent phenotype.
Why the study?
The functional role of nsp3 and its interactions with nucleocapsid protein in SARS-CoV-2 replication and pathogenesis were not fully understood.
The interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Nsp3 and N proteins is critical for viral replication and pathogenesis, providing insights into viral fitness mechanisms.
Nsp3-n interactions may represent an antiviral target; leaves open relevance to human SARS-CoV-2 variants and disease.
SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19 encodes at least 16 nonstructural proteins of variably understood function. Nsp3, the largest nonstructural protein contains several domains, including a SARS-unique domain (SUD), which occurs only in Sarbecovirus . The SUD has a role in preferentially enhancing viral translation. During isolation of mouse-adapted SARS-CoV-2, we isolated an attenuated virus that contained a single mutation in a linker region of nsp3 (nsp3-S676T). The S676T mutation decreased virus replication in cultured cells and primary human cells and in mice. Nsp3-S676T alleviated the SUD translational enhancing ability by decreasing the interaction between two translation factors, Paip1 and PABP1. We also identified a compensatory mutation in the nucleocapsid (N) protein (N-S194L) that restored the virulent phenotype, without directly binding to SUD. Together, these results reveal an aspect of nsp3-N interactions, which impact both SARS-CoV-2 replication and, consequently, pathogenesis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) studied SARS-CoV-2. nsp3-S676T mutation was evaluated on Virus replication and translational enhancing ability. The nsp3-S676T mutation decreased SARS-CoV-2 replication in cells and mice by reducing Paip1 and PABP1 interaction, while a compensatory N-S194L mutation restored the virulent phenotype.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: