This exploratory qualitative study examines how spatial conditions influence the resolution – or ‘collapse’ – of affective superposition among rural teachers. While policy interventions can catalyse this resolution, the conditions under which it occurs remain underexplored. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 28 rural teachers in eastern China during the transitional period of 2023, when residual Covid-19 restrictions continued to constrain spatial mobility in many rural schools, we find that spatial mobility – regular commutes, family visits, temporary escapes – is perceived as a necessary condition for resolution to occur. When spatial mobility is suspended, resolution is delayed or prevented, leaving teachers in unresolved superposition. We also identify three substitutes for spatial mobility – meaningful recognition, embodied mentorship, and curated evidence of impact – that can enable resolution despite spatial constraints. The study contributes a spatial boundary condition to the affective superposition framework, showing that collapse depends on teachers’ ability to move between worlds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: