Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 17, 2026Clinical Oral Implants Research

Retrospective Evaluation of Zygomatic Implant Therapy in Patients With Severe Tooth Agenesis and Maxillary Deficiencies: Clinical Outcomes and Safety up to 15 Years of Follow‐Up

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

BTBaoxin TaoFWFeng WangYSYihan Shen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Retrospective study demonstrates high long-term survival of zygomatic implants in severe tooth agenesis, suggesting a viable alternative for severe maxillary deficiencies.

Key Points

  • To evaluate the clinical outcomes, safety, and long-term efficacy of zygomatic implants in individuals with severe oligodontia, anodontia, and associated maxillary deficiencies.
  • Reviewed 27 patients (aged 18–37 years, mean 22.63; 20 syndromic) with severe oligodontia or anodontia treated with zygomatic implants over a 15-year period.
  • Protocols combined extensive bone grafting with conventional implants and either a single zygomatic implant or Quad Zygoma technique, followed by immediate or delayed loading of full-arch prostheses.
  • Outcomes were tracked over a mean follow-up period of 55.07 months (range: 13.27–179.2 months).
  • All 85 zygomatic implants achieved successful osseointegration, resulting in an early survival rate of 100%.
  • Crude survival rates were 98.5% (84/85) for zygomatic implants versus 76.19% (32/42) for conventional implants at the implant level, and 96.3% (26/27) versus 64.71% (11/17) at the patient level.
  • The primary complications associated with zygomatic implants included maxillary sinus opacification and peri-implant soft-tissue recession.

Cite This Study

Tao et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aabb7c95f706d05830e7171https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70174
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share