Technical report, version 1.0 (September 2026). Companion to the dataset "AI Discovery Radar — adoption measurements for machine-readable discovery and consent routes" (concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22178282). Adoption of machine-readable discovery and consent files for automated clients — robots.txt, llms.txt, TDMRep, agent cards, MCP manifests and others — is widely asserted and rarely counted. This report documents the method behind a monthly measurement of 34 catalogued routes on a frozen, stratified frame of 30,000 registrable domains (Tranco + Chrome UX Report; deliberately over-weighting German-, Austrian-, Swiss- and Italian-language sites). It contributes (1) a seven-state classification model with a denominator rule that separates refusal from non-adoption, (2) a two-tier, reproducible sampling design — a fixed panel for change and rotating blocks for coverage — and (3) an admission procedure for the route catalogue. Adoption here means publicly observable, syntactically valid availability of a route — deployment, not consumption. The September 2026 run illustrates the method; with two panel points under two ruleset versions, no trend is claimed. The report names its principal open question — adoption behind bot walls — and records the decision to widen the panel from 1,000 to 10,000 domains from October 2026. Measurement pitfalls (soft-404 envelopes, walls answering 404, Range-header traps, template adoption) are documented so that others can avoid them. Licence CC BY 4.0.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Florian Berger (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: